Two buttons, two lines
Sold to tenant records a sale at the selling price. The invoice line reads "Bottled water ×2". The P&L credits the sale under extras and charges the cost under stock consumed; the difference is margin. Damaged · bill at cost records a loss at the item's cost. The invoice line reads "Damage · drinking glass ×2 · at cost". The P&L charges the cost under stock consumed and credits exactly the same amount under recoveries; margin is zero.
Why keep them apart
Fairness first: a tenant should make you whole, not make you a profit, on something they broke — and a charge at cost with the receipt behind it ends most arguments before they start. Then the books: recoveries are not sales, and a P&L that mixes them overstates how well the minibar is doing.
Damage that is not stock
A cracked tile, a burnt socket: not inventory items. That is a ticket closed with a cost, then billed to the tenant or held against the deposit. Same principle — at cost, with the contractor's receipt.
Against the deposit instead
Mid-tenancy, bill it. At move-out, deduct it. Both buttons offer both. The deductions statement at move-out lists each damage line with its cost and, where there is one, the photo from inspection.
Was this useful?
Thank you — that is what it was written for.
Describes the platform as it is today. Something out of date? Tell us. · help 0.71.0






